Skip to content

Netlogon CVE-2026-41089 Detection and Forensics: Hunting for Domain Controller Compromise

With active exploitation of CVE-2026-41089 confirmed, security teams must run parallel tracks: patching domain controllers and investigating whether exploitation has already occurred. A successful Netlogon exploitation typically leads to Golden Ticket persistence and stealthy domain admin account creation — the forensic indicators are specific and searchable.

Article security-operations

Patching domain controllers for CVE-2026-41089 addresses the vulnerability but does not answer the question that matters most for already-exposed environments: was the vulnerability exploited before the patch was applied? This guide covers the detection indicators and investigation steps for CVE-2026-41089 post-exploitation on Windows Active Directory domain controllers.

Exploitation Indicators on the Domain Controller

Successful CVE-2026-41089 exploitation executes attacker code as SYSTEM on the DC. The initial exploitation event may not generate obvious log entries, but the post-exploitation activity almost always does.

Windows Security Log — Event ID 4688 (Process Creation): Look for unusual processes spawned by the Netlogon service (netlogon.exe as parent) or by lsass.exe (which the attacker may use as a process injection target after achieving SYSTEM):

Get-WinEvent -ComputerName <DC> -FilterHashtable @{
    LogName='Security'
    Id=4688
    StartTime=(Get-Date).AddDays(-7)
} | Where-Object { $_.Properties[13].Value -match 'netlogon|lsass' } | 
Select-Object TimeCreated, @{N='NewProcess';E={$_.Properties[5].Value}}, @{N='ParentProcess';E={$_.Properties[13].Value}}

Windows Security Log — Event ID 4624/4625 (Logon/Logon Failure): Exploitation attempts generate authentication events. A stack of rapid 4625 failures followed by a 4624 success from an external IP is a strong exploitation indicator:

Get-WinEvent -FilterHashtable @{
    LogName='Security'
    Id=@(4624,4625)
    StartTime=(Get-Date).AddDays(-7)
} | Where-Object { $_.Properties[18].Value -notmatch '^(10\.|172\.|192\.168\.)' -and $_.Properties[18].Value -ne '-' } |
Group-Object { $_.Properties[18].Value } |
Where-Object { $_.Count -gt 10 }

Windows System Log — Event ID 7045 (New Service Installed): Post-exploitation persistence often involves installing a malicious service:

Get-WinEvent -FilterHashtable @{
    LogName='System'
    Id=7045
    StartTime=(Get-Date).AddDays(-7)
} | Select-Object TimeCreated, @{N='ServiceName';E={$_.Properties[0].Value}}, @{N='ImagePath';E={$_.Properties[1].Value}}

Privilege Abuse Indicators

New Domain Admin accounts:

# Check for accounts created in the last 7 days that are members of privileged groups
$cutoff = (Get-Date).AddDays(-7)
Get-ADGroupMember 'Domain Admins' | ForEach-Object {
    $user = Get-ADUser $_ -Properties WhenCreated
    if ($user.WhenCreated -gt $cutoff) {
        Write-Output "SUSPICIOUS: $($user.SamAccountName) added to Domain Admins on $($user.WhenCreated)"
    }
}

Golden Ticket indicators: A Golden Ticket (forged Kerberos TGT using the domain’s krbtgt hash) produces authentication events with specific anomalies. Look for Kerberos TGT tickets with:

  • Ticket lifetime exceeding the domain policy maximum (Event ID 4769 with long-lived tickets)
  • Ticket requesting service access from an IP address inconsistent with the account’s normal logon location
  • The KRBTGT account password change (Event ID 4723) — responders typically change the krbtgt password twice as part of DC compromise remediation; if you see this event recently and your team did not initiate it, it may indicate attacker covering tracks

Network-Level Detection

If your environment logs SMB traffic or has a network detection/response (NDR) solution, look for:

  • NetrLogonSendToSam calls from unexpected sources to domain controller TCP 445
  • Large-volume SMB negotiation attempts from single IP addresses (scanning behaviour)
  • TCP 445 connections from external IP addresses to DC addresses (if perimeter rules should prevent this but the traffic reached the DC)

LSASS Memory Dump Detection

Post-exploitation, attackers typically dump LSASS memory to extract credentials. Event ID 10 from Sysmon (process access) with GrantedAccess rights including 0x1fffff (full process access) targeting lsass.exe from unexpected processes is a primary indicator:

# Requires Sysmon event logging
Get-WinEvent -FilterHashtable @{
    LogName='Microsoft-Windows-Sysmon/Operational'
    Id=10
    StartTime=(Get-Date).AddDays(-7)
} | Where-Object { $_.Properties[5].Value -match 'lsass' -and $_.Properties[8].Value -match '0x1fffff|0x143a|0x1010' }

If Compromise Is Confirmed

Active Directory compromise requires a structured response beyond patching:

  1. Isolate the compromised DC from the network — do not shut down, as this destroys volatile forensic evidence
  2. Preserve forensic evidence: Take a memory image and disk snapshot before any remediation
  3. Identify all privileged access that occurred from the compromise time to discovery
  4. Rotate krbtgt twice (with 10+ hours between rotations to allow ticket expiry)
  5. Rotate all service account passwords and review all service principal names
  6. Engage IR support — a confirmed AD domain compromise is typically a major incident requiring specialist response

Share this article

Related Intelligence

🛡️ SecOps

One Week After CVE-2026-41089: Taking Stock of the Netlogon Response Across Enterprise Environments

Seven days after Belgium's CCB confirmed active exploitation of the Netlogon CVSS 9.8 vulnerability, the picture of enterprise response is mixed. Domain controllers in well-governed environments are patched; a significant population of legacy and unmanaged DCs remain exposed. This review covers the response pattern and what it reveals about enterprise patch discipline.

#netlogon +6
🛡️ SecOps

Citrix NetScaler CVE-2026-3055 Forensics: Post-Exploitation Detection for SAML IDP Compromise

With large-scale exploitation of CVE-2026-3055 confirmed as of 28 May, NetScaler ADC deployments that were internet-accessible while unpatched must be assessed for compromise. The SAML memory overread can leak session tokens and signing key material — understanding the forensic footprint helps determine whether compromise occurred.

#citrix +7
🛡️ SecOps

UniFi OS Bulletin 064 Post-Disclosure Forensics: Detecting Compromise on Ubiquiti Controllers

Two days after Ubiquiti published Security Bulletin 064 with three CVSS 10.0 vulnerabilities, security teams should be confirming that patches have applied and hunting for indicators of pre-patch compromise. This guide covers the specific log sources, indicators, and commands available on UniFi OS devices for detecting exploitation activity.

#ubiquiti +6